Tuesday 10 January 2012

Government reiterates that women with PIP breast implants do not need to have their implants removed

Head of Litigation at Hugh James, Mark Harvey condemns Government’s lack of control over ‘powerful cosmetic industry’

The Government announced on Friday 6 January that there is no need for routine removal of PIP breast implants. However, it continued to state that the NHS should pay for women who were fitted with these implants through the NHS and that it expected private clinics to follow suit. Renowned campaigning lawyer Mark Harvey, Partner and head of the top ranked personal injury team at Hugh James solicitors, is representing over 600 women with PIP implants of which over 300 have contacted Hugh James in the last two weeks. Reacting to the recent announcement Mark Harvey commented that:

“The announcement is indecisive and sends out mixed messages to women across the UK affected by the PIP implants; it will be a big disappointment to our clients who have again been shown a complete lack of support and care from the Government and I know they will feel let down. On the one hand, they have recommended that the NHS should remove implants for concerned women if they have had their implants on the NHS, which we of course support. However, by only making a suggestion that the cosmetic industry should follow the example of the NHS then the Government again leaves women vulnerable. The announcement also suggests that the Government has no power to enforce this on the clinics; leaving this powerful cosmetic industry to their own devices. From our client’s experiences with many of these clinics to date, they have shown affected women no sympathy or support and we are extremely concerned that this announcement will again allow cosmetic clinics to leave women to try to sort out this serious problem alone. The announcement has gone against recommendations already made by the professionals of the review group who must have the most relevant expertise and this will again, as has been caused  already by the MHRA and the Government’s dealing of this scandal, cause greater uncertainty and concern for our clients. Worst of all it goes against what Mr Lansley was telling the clinics early this week, that they should be removing the implants”.
The announcement was made following a Government review of the risks posed by faulty silicone breast implants after suggestions that more than 3,000 may be affected by these implants that were recalled in March 2010. Following contradictory data about the rupture rate of these implants, Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, announced last Saturday that there were fears that existing evidence about potential dangers was not reliable.

Mark Harvey will be continuing to pursue legal claims on behalf of his clients and will be making an application to the Court for a Group Litigation Order at the end of the month so that the legal issues may be dealt with by a Judge later this year. 

3 comments:

  1. So is the picture really all that bad? Well for those who had the said breast implants, it is. PIP is made up of substandard materials in order to cut the cost! And this idea of using substandard material to cut cost and increase profit margin is unethical since these could possibly lead to fatal condition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Surgical breast augmentation is a substantial investment of time and money, it has a lot of health consequences and the results can never be fully predictable. All together, these factors can make breast augmentation a last resort for those who want to change the size and shape of their breasts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A nice post for the readers. The blog is informative and useful for the people to benefit from.

    ReplyDelete